[Solution] MGTCB/526: Managing In A Changing Environment Competency 2 – Assessment

MGTCB/526 Competency 2 Rubric Page 1 of 3

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

 

 

MGTCB/526 Competency 2 – Assessment and Rubric Course Title: Managing in a Changing Environment

Competency Assessment Title: Organizational Analysis

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions:

As a recent hire, you’d like to become familiar with the current organizational structure in your company. This organizational chart (org chart) has not yet been created, so you decide to make your own.

Create an org chart of your company. This high-level information is typically found on the company’s website or other websites about the organization. The org chart should include key leadership and level of responsibility. If the information is not public, base your decisions on a similar organization and research. You may use any Microsoft® program or web-based program.

Write a 1000- to 1200- word proposal to the company, of your plan to align the operational needs with business strategies based on your analysis. Complete the following in your proposal:

• Explain in 350-words the structure of your org chart. o Discuss the type of hierarchy and related details of each role. o Assess how each role in the organizational chart is related to the other areas within the organization.

• Analyze of the company based on Porter’s Five Forces.

• Analyze the effectiveness of the leadership model the company is currently using.

• Consider the current leadership style or styles in place at the company.

• Determine the effectiveness of the leadership style/s and whether an alternative style/s would be more impactful.

• Assess how to determine effective leadership. What makes a leader effective or ineffective?

• Consider sources of managerial power when leaders are effective.

• Provide a recommendation for the following actions: o Leadership model changes not reflected in the current organizational chart (Part 1) o 2- to 3- actions needed to align operational needs with business strategies previously identified

Include the organizational chart with your proposal. Submit your proposal

 

 

MGTCB/526 Competency 2 Rubric Page 2 of 3

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Rubric

Assignment/ Performance Criteria Mastery

100% Meets Expectations

85% Not Met

0%

1. Organizational Chart (weight 12%)

The organizational chart clearly defines the key leadership and level of responsibility.

The organizational chart somewhat clearly defines the key leadership and level of responsibility.

The organizational chart does not define the key leadership and level of responsibility.

2. Explanation of organizational chart (weight 15%)

Thoroughly explained the role details including the relationships within other areas of the organization.

Somewhat explained the role details including the relationships within other areas of the organization.

Did not explain the role details including the relationships within other areas of the organization.

3. Analysis based on Porter’s Five Forces

(weight 15%)

The leadership model recommendation was comprehensive.

The leadership model recommendation was average.

The leadership model recommendation was limited or no attempt at a recommendation for leadership model changes was made.

4. Analysis of current contingency leadership model

(weight 12%)

Recommendations to further align operational needs with business strategies were fully complete.

Recommendations to further align operational needs with business strategies were somewhat complete.

Recommendations to further align operational needs with business strategies were incomplete no attempt was made at a recommendation for further actions needed to align operational needs with business strategies.

5. Analysis of current contingency leadership model

(weight 12%)

Fully integrated relevant supporting evidence from quality sources

Mostly integrated relevant supporting evidence from quality sources

Minimally integrated relevant supporting evidence from quality sources no attempt was made to submit supporting evidence

6. Leadership model recommendation

(weight 15%)

The leadership model recommendation was comprehensive.

The leadership model recommendation was average.

The leadership model recommendation was limited or no attempt at a recommendation for leadership model changes was made.

 

 

MGTCB/526 Competency 2 Rubric Page 3 of 3

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/ Performance Criteria Mastery

100% Meets Expectations

85% Not Met

0%

7. Other identified actions recommendation

(weight 15%)

Recommendations to further align operational needs with business strategies were fully complete.

Recommendations to further align operational needs with business strategies were somewhat complete.

Recommendations to further align operational needs with business strategies were incomplete no attempt was made at a recommendation for further actions needed to align operational needs with business strategies.

8. Information literacy (weight 4%)

Fully integrated relevant supporting evidence from quality sources

Mostly integrated relevant supporting evidence from quality sources

Minimally integrated relevant supporting evidence from quality sources no attempt was made to submit supporting evidence

I will write a quality paper in business
Welcome to my profile where I write quality papers in business and other related subjects

Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level assignment writers. Use Coupon Code: FIRST10 to Get 20% OFF Your First Order

Order now